Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (84907)	12/27/2006 6:29:58 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

It wasn't Kerry who led us into a catastophic failure of war in Iraq with 3,000 lost American lives and a cost of a trillion dollars.

To: longnshort who wrote (84907)	12/27/2006 6:31:08 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

It wasn't Kerry who added $3 Trillion to our national debt.

To: longnshort who wrote (84907)	12/27/2006 6:57:45 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Kerry probably beat Bush in 2004 if not for the massive GOP cheating in Ohio. If not then he came very-very close. But we will never know because Bushies cheated across the board in Ohio, then covered up the evidence. The Ohio cheating was much worse than in Florida 2000 where Bushies also stole the election. That one was an obvious theft. Also, Bush's 2004 campaign was one big fat lie. I defy you to find a single campaign ad, pledge or attack Bush put out there which turned out to be true. Ansd his smearvet campaign was one of the biggest and most evil hoaxes ever perpetrated on the American People by a sitting president. Kerry may have a tough time in 2008, but I'm sure he could beat McCain or Romney or Guliani, if nominated. And I predict Dems will end up nominating a white male after all the bourhaha over Hillary and Obama. That means Gore, Kerry, Edwards or Biden. Of those, Kerry is arguably the strongest choice, though Gore as the first man cheated by Bush is first in line and would probably win (if he runs).

To: longnshort who wrote (84907)	12/27/2006 7:05:20 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

If Kerry is a "joke" why are you obsessed with smearing him? Bushies only smear who they fear and secretly respect the most. Your bun buddy johnflipflopper even named himself after Kerry, which is a huge backhanded compliment. The Whgite House spent two whole days before the election lying to the public about Kerry's botched joke. More evidence of who they really fear. The only reason Democrats are hesitent to nominate Kerry again was because of the fact Kerry refused to get down into the mud with the Bushies and respond strongly enough to their smearvet campaign of lies. Perhaps Kerry made a mistake there. I advised them to call a press conference and offer to disprove any smearvet charge with facts. But Kerry wanted to stick to real issues. That actually showed integrity. Every single Kerry TV ad and debating point was true and correct as he focused on the very same issues Amerifcans are most worried about today. Just the opposite for Bush. So in 2000 and 2004 the cheaters and liars won, but don't expect that to continue. American voters are fed up with dirty politics.