Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rubbersoul who wrote (70430)	12/27/2006 10:50:06 PM
From: esalad	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 312951

Take a look at the insider buys since Nov.3 761,000 shares Journey Resources Corp. (JNY) As of December 26th, 2006 Filing Date Transaction Date Insider Name Nature of transaction Securities # or value acquired or disposed of Unit Price Dec 01/06 Nov 22/06 De Melt, Len 10 - Acquisition in the public market Common Shares 50,000 $0.360 Dec 01/06 Nov 22/06 De Melt, Len 10 - Acquisition in the public market Common Shares 50,000 $0.360 Nov 22/06 Nov 21/06 De Melt, Len 10 - Acquisition in the public market Common Shares 100,000 $0.360 Nov 22/06 Nov 06/06 De Melt, Len 10 - Acquisition in the public market Common Shares 81,000 $0.349 Nov 22/06 Nov 03/06 De Melt, Len 10 - Acquisition in the public market Common Shares 414,000 $0.310 Nov 22/06 Nov 02/06 De Melt, Len 00 - Opening Balance-Initial SEDI Report Common Shares Nov 22/06 Nov 21/06 Bal, Jatinder Singh 10 - Acquisition in the public market Common Shares 26,000 $0.370 Nov 22/06 Nov 20/06 Bal, Jatinder Singh 10 - Acquisition in the public market Common Shares 15,000 $0.380 Nov 22/06 Nov 17/06 Bal, Jatinder Singh 10 - Acquisition in the public market Common Shares 10,000 $0.350 Nov 22/06 Nov 16/06 Bal, Jatinder Singh 10 - Acquisition in the public market Common Shares 15,000 $0.350 canadianinsider.com

To: rubbersoul who wrote (70430)	12/28/2006 10:17:54 AM
From: zoo york	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 312951

Hi John! I think both CS and SPM have been active drilling for a while so we could get drill results any day from them. UC had only completed a couple of holes by December so we may get some news by the end of January, but I also heard they want to release the news in a batch so they may not be reporting anything for a while. And I think IPT has some drill data from holes they did in the fall, but they are still trying to close an acquisition of a small parcel of land in the middle of their holdings so they want to get that done before they post any news. I checked out JNY a while back but the float is so tight that the stock just ran away before I got any. Haven't looked at it recently. Thanks for the info. Cheers! COACH247 PS: I wish I had bought more of that SBB below a buck. I am still trying to remember why I only grabbed a small chunk...

To: rubbersoul who wrote (70430)	1/1/2007 11:49:03 PM
From: zoo york	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 312951

Hi John! <Have you taken a look at JNY? Their market cap is less than 10 million and their Mexico property "Vianey hosts a non 43-101 compliant historical resource of 345,020 metric tonnes in all categories, grading 2.13% lead, 3.66% zinc and 269 grams of silver per tonne." > I had a few minutes this evening to have another look at JNY. The results they posted are certainly exceptional grade, but they are selective chip samples. The problem is that it is very easy to select high grade chip samples from visible ore shoots underground, and then on a per tonne basis they appear to be phenomenal grade ore material, however the problem is that this is not very often representative of the true mineralization of a deposit. However, I know Peter Hawley who wrote the NI43-101 technical report, and I also know Rod Blakestead, their consulting geologist. I am going to try and phone them this week, and if they are in Vancouver for the Cambridge Show I will try to meet with them, and see what they have to say about that project. The biggest problem that I can state off the bat is that it is located in Guerrero State, which is the southern end of the Sierra Madre mineral belt, and the politics of the region are a bit sketchy. There are numerous groups of armed drug smugglers and they tend to shoot people they do not want around, including geologists, so it is a little riskier to do business in that state than other parts of Mexico. I will follow up with more info later if I learn more. cheers! COACH247