Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (1249)	12/30/2006 2:16:20 AM
From: Thompkins24	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1681

rrufff - two things: 1. You are asking "You're lying. Show me a recent post where I defend the company." Ok, no problem, in fact there are many posts where you are defending SLJB. Would the email/fax blast spam fiasco clear your memory? You were defending the company in its false and misleading press release whereby it denied being involved in or paying for email/fax blasts, yet it was proven otherwise. In your defense of the company, you even went as far as falsely accusing the evil "paid bashers" of being the ones that actually paid for the SLJB email/fax blasts. Let me know if you would like for me to show all of your posts defending the company in this regard. 2. Now on the second topic, you state: You made a blanket statement that Suljas testified against Petar and So, don't tell me I can't cite part of your post. That's your tactic. that was my point, namely by citing only part of my statement IT IS YOU THAT TURNED MY STATEMENT INTO A BLANKET STATEMENT. If you have a question on my statement about testimony against Petar Vucicevich, then copy the full statement, not part of it. Message #1249 from rrufff at 12/30/2006 1:32:45 AM You're lying. Show me a recent post where I defend the company. It's never been more than a very speculative holding. I've never urged anyone to buy. It's wormstyle lies, posting an accusation and being unable to come up with a post to support the claim. Do you deny being NASD fined and suspended? So, don't tell me I can't cite part of your post. That's your tactic. You have nothing. You refuse to answer questions about your other SI alias. Do you deny having another one? You made a blanket statement that Suljas testified against Petar. That may be true, but perhaps you'd like to post your evidence that this has occurred. I see nothing in your post or anyone else's to support this. I'm not defending SLJB with this post. I'm just posting out misrepresentations by you. Let's see any evidence that shows Suljas testifying AGAINST Petar as you claim. Don't just bluster.