SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (756629)12/30/2006 4:05:29 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 769670
 
"Is that what the 9-11 Commission found?"

Er... I believe that the 9-11 Commission's mandate only extended to examining certain matters *up to* the time of the 9-11 attacks.

So, anything that happened AFTER the attacks, of course was not covered by their investigations AT ALL.

(So, the war in Afghanistan against the Taliban and al Qaeda, including the so-called 'Airlift of Evil' back to Pakistan, and the war in Iraq, etc., were all *not covered*, not part of their purview.)

On the other-hand, the Pakistani General's (leader of the ISI, Pak's CIA-equivalent) wiring of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta the week before the 9-11 attack WAS mentioned in the report... (despite what I'm sure was great pressure to keep it, and most anything else perceived as 'harmful to US/Pakistan relations, out of the report), and regular news reports from 9-12 reported his meetings at the CIA that day (before knowledge of the wire transfer became public).

No doubt, since the wire transaction was *widely reported* in most every major media outlet of the world, in the weeks immediately after the attacks... it would have been, er... difficult to not even mention it at all in the Commission's report. :-)

However, the ENTIRE CHAPTER devoted to the involvement of Saudi Arabia, and various Saudi Arabian persons, was --- and STILL IS --- *blacked-out* in the Commission's report.

Make of that what you will....