Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Done, gone. who wrote (1259)	12/30/2006 12:20:20 PM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1681

I trade about 100 stocks. I post about many. I have no problems with negative opinions. Maybe next time you'll actually do some DD and not just piggy back. I look forward to civilly debating any stock with you. I mean that. I've admitted in the past that I learned much from truthseeker years ago, even though I believe that I was often more right in many of the stocks where we tangled. See, e.g., AOL, ASKJ and I think CNET. I do learn from negatives. What you don't seem to understand is that any stock can be bashed. The pink sheet stock market is something that I would change as I've often posted and would require full disclosure, including re the activities of hedge funds. I would open the MM function and bring it into the 21st century. Yes, a high percentage of stocks are scams but people trade them successfully. I'm not going to stop because of the risk that you might call every stock a scam when you're not in them. I think it's better to advocate changing the system than to generically bash. There are some stocks that I believe may actually be trying to foster a strong shareholder base. See, e.g., LBWR. It's not exciting and it hasn't done much, but the CEO is open and, so far, very little dilution and dumping.