Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (9520)	12/30/2006 9:54:33 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224729

Vietnam and Iraq were both unwinnable because of the reasons I listed. We could kill half the people in those countries and still we wouldn't win because the more you kill the angrier they get at you. And it's their country not ours, so where are they going to go? They have no choice but to stand and fight us. Just like if the Chinese invaded the US they could never win either. We would fight them forever if that's how long it took. We killed over two million human beings in Vietnam, most of them innocent. I guess that means nothing to a rightwing extremist like you though. You creeps love war for war's sake. Doesn't even have to be a reason for them. War-war-war, yet your own leaders rarely dare to serve themselves. They are fat cat profiteering cowards sending American heros to die in their sons' places. They are a real disgrace. In 1964 we hadn't learned that lesson yet, but we sure as hell did by 1969 and we definitely should have by 2003. Kerry was absolutely right in 1971 and is absolutely right about Bush not heeding the lessons of history now.