SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mistermj who wrote (211448)1/1/2007 8:54:32 PM
From: geode00  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Do the work mjfdl if you can work a calculator. This is the FIFTH TIME I'm asking you to defend your argument. Obviously that's beyond your paygrade.

=========
I've asked you many times before to compare apples to apples.

Obviously you can't.

Why is that.

Also, a cursory check of the 'raw' figures doesn't show Somalia.

Why is that.

If I'm reading this chart correctly, in 2004 the total deaths under Bush was 1887. Giving him 1189 on average for his Presidency.

Also, these figures seem to exclude active duty Guard and Reserve but that's unclear. I don't know how that figures in the Bush stats since, if I remember correctly, some 40% of those in Iraq are Guard and Reserves.

BTW the 'raw' figures show exactly 1 person dying of hostile action under Clinton. That is a decent number.

===========
In addition, don't forget to figure out what happened to Somalia's 18 dead and where the Bush War Profiteers and Mercenaries figure into this.



To: mistermj who wrote (211448)1/1/2007 9:35:36 PM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 281500
 
George W. Bush...5187 (2001-2004) 2004??? Why just to 2004???? And what about the 50,000 wounded Americans (most of them critically wounded and maimed for life)??? Sheesh... the Republican traitor party just keeps lying and spinning... sheesh...