SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mistermj who wrote (211563)1/2/2007 3:32:44 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 281500
 
And using your data I found that deaths were pretty stable from 1992(pecentage wise)- until 2002- when deaths went to .07 (2002), .099 (2003) and .1337 (2004), percentage wise.

I may have made accounting errors (again), my accounting skills are terrible, but you cannot fail to see the trend- work it out yourself (and I didn't mean that in a snotty way, I just meant "so you can trust the numbers").

So I'm not sure what you think it is your graph shows other than that you can compare apples and oranges and tells us there are different numbers of apples and oranges. In other words, if there is a relationship between your apples and oranges, I'm not seeing it. I'd like to see it, but I don't. Can you explicitly tell me what it is you think your graph shows?



To: mistermj who wrote (211563)1/2/2007 3:37:08 PM
From: geode00  Respond to of 281500
 
"It's only fair to ask for the same from you when making your points."

Isn't she using YOUR DATA? The DATA you didn't bother to look at because you were only able to exert enough energy to spam this thread again and again and again with that ridiculous chart?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News