Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Uranium Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: teevee who wrote (5948)	1/2/2007 4:45:14 PM
From: Cheeky Kid	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30230

>I have been a global warming doubter until recently.< I still do doubt it, but hey, if everyone else believes it, and they say uranium is the answer, then hey, I go with the flow.

To: teevee who wrote (5948)	1/2/2007 6:12:58 PM
From: roto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30230

environmentalists?? being in the NorthWest, currently in Idaho, for the past 35 years the problems associated with nuclear power cannot be totally attributed to environmental concerns of that day. The default by WPPSS (Washington Public Power Supply System) on it's bonds, the largest default in history till that time, is what killed the nuclear industry. today's NorthWest environment concerns itself with salmon recovery issues. we may lightly dismiss this "other" problem of power generation but the damn dams are the primary culprit in prevention of salmon recoveries. unfortunately the US resembles (as in,is) a large corporate state that is not too willing to rededicate it's resources else ware unless it is ultimately rewarded handsomely, and I think Wall Street has been antagonistic toward nuclear power generation the past few decades. in all likelihood, it will be environmental concerns of global warming or "saving the world" that will generate a new enthusiasm for nuclear power & maybe make us rich! my take this day, Loach