Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocket Red who wrote (70682)	1/2/2007 4:50:02 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 312637

I meant in a general sense. I didn't read the part about BGL. When was the last CKG PR? What are they doing with the scads of cash they're burning? Where's the beef?

To: Rocket Red who wrote (70682)	1/2/2007 7:02:08 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 312637

- BGL has more than hot air I agree and I never said that BGL had only hot air. - and CC is way out of line on BGL It could be. I can make errors. Please let me know BGL main assets and how you value them. - CKG is hope to me and I don't buy hope stocks at expensive prices Well BGL has market value near $65M, CKG has market value near $102M (before AAU merger). But CKG has $29M in the bank compared to $5M for BGL all fully diluted before the merger. Those are similar valuations net of cash (CKG: $73M, BGL $60M). So CKG is not a lot more expensive than BGL. I am sure you have taken the time to understand CKG's mineral assets and BGL mineral assets before you make the statement you did. Care to develop further?