Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (211604)	1/2/2007 7:19:46 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Why is it so small if the county is so big? I'm not getting that graph- shouldn't it be larger (second graph line) if it's abnormally large as a county? If you print them out, and overlay them, then hold them up to a light you can visually combine the results. The top graph is unnormalized vote. The 2'nd is the same data, just normalized. What you will find when overlayed, is that all the larger samples from chart #2 come from small vote totals (off chart 1) except for Palm Beach. It is large on both plots. These charts don't directly let you get total vote, but you can infer it from the combination. Palm Beach was in fact not the largest, that is why it gets shrunk a bit on the 2'nd graph. But all the other large counties had very low Buchanan votes. See the data I provided in a prior post.