Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (221961)	1/2/2007 9:35:33 PM
From: kpf	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Sarmad 3- Has it occurred in the past that a processor was shipping in systems for 4 weeks, and no such system was mentioned as having been seen by any reviewer, or anyone, actually Sure. This phenomenon is not unusual in this industry. Seen in dozens of times in the last two decades. ;-) No reason for any embarrassment. AMD did not not even bother to show some in etail. It could have done. K.

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (221961)	1/2/2007 9:41:56 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Respond to of 275872

Sarmad It's hard to imagine anything that would shake these guys out of their illusion. There is no 65nm product but that just doesn't register. It's been nearly a month since the supposed release and it's obvious to everyone else that this was a fraud. There is no 65nm product. AMD claimed they'd be ready for 65nm production in mid '05. That's the year before last and nothing is available now in 2007. Intel was shipping 65nm the year before last and now AMD is bragging about how good 45nm is coming along! Can you believe this is actually happening?