Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (24813)	1/3/2007 7:05:10 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35834

Unbelievable! Where do I start? How about reading comprehension? I said, << "Unlike the left wing media, the CIA does not have an established history of lying or intentionally misleading the public in their official pronouncements." >> And somehow you think that an almost 30 year old affidavit from a criminal prosecution establishes a history of lying or intentionally misleading the public in the CIA's official pronouncements. Ya, right. What part of "established history" don't you understand? And if you think that a Google search on any subject proves anything other than Google is capable of aggregating a web based list matching one or more key words you are delusional at best. Do you have any idea what credible, independently verifiable evidence means? Can you tell the difference between a baseless assertion & a proven fact? Are you aware that there is a world of difference between an unsubstantiated opinion & irrefutable evidence? << "If you google the words "CIA" and "Lies" you get about a million links." >> Heh! Heh! I Googled "Clinton" & "lies" & got about 3 million hits. Does that prove Clinton lied 3 times more often than the CIA? "Gore" & "lies" got about 1.5 million hits. Did Gore lie 50% more often than the CIA? "Media" & "lies" got more than 52 million hits, so that must prove beyond a shadow of any doubt I was right about the MSM, 'eh? Shall I go on?