Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noel de Leon who wrote (211764)	1/4/2007 7:22:24 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I've provided many sources of Saddam's responsibility in the past and am tired of reposting the same over and over. I know you don't really care. I just gave a couple of examples which anyone can check via the internet. Saddam had to have allowed Zarqawi in the country and allowed him to operate - it was a police state during Saddam's days. The other example - we know Saddam provided sanctuary and a government job to a man wanted in the US for his part in the 1993 WTC destruction attempt - that is involvement after the fact. Given the other circumstances Iraqi govt involvement before the fact is almost certain. No proof would be acceptable to you unless we found a signed order in Saddam's handwriting ordering a terror attack - unlikely to ever get that kind of ironclad proof - and if it were offered, you'd claim it was forged. Now as to McVeigh - no I wouldn't blame his mother because he was born here. But anyone who provided him resources and financing and sanctuary before or after the fact (had he been on the lam for any length of time) I would blame. Which is what Saddam did.