SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (211834)1/5/2007 4:47:06 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 281500
 
Been awhile since I read that - all I remember off the top of my head is the stuff about names and how drug gangs work.

Demanding evidence of the type that would stand up in our courtrooms with all their rules on evidence is difficult. In real life you go with the best info you have. And using common sense and experience is advisable.

If your kids throw a basketball over your back fence and the nasty neighbors confiscate it, then a few weeks later a basketball remarkably like it flies through your window at 2AM, do you need to have caught the neighbor in the act of throwing it on a security camera to prove it was him? I'd say common sense tells you who threw it.



To: epicure who wrote (211834)1/5/2007 5:02:31 PM
From: mistermj  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
Iktomi...you raving hypocrite.

Where is your evidence that teachers work in poor working conditions compared to the private sector as you tried to tell me?

I've asked for evidence to support your claims numerous times as you tried to imply teachers aren't even allowed proper bathroom breaks?

Now where is it?

Wasn't "common sense" pretty much debunked in Freakonomics?

When I read the book, that was my main thought.

The lesson of Freakonomics (it seems to me) was demand evidence, and make sure the conclusions drawn fit the data (but the data part was kind of essential).