Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (211909)	1/6/2007 2:20:14 PM
From: neolib	Respond to of 281500

P.S. Saddam can never be put back into power, so tough. And Humpty Dumpty Iraq can't be put back together again either.

To: Ilaine who wrote (211909)	1/6/2007 3:11:45 PM
From: SARMAN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

No one is unhappy to see Saddam go, however, how could those overpaid fat cat in Washington missed the consequence of removing Saddam from power? Bush father knew the consequence of removing Saddam and left him there. Not only he left him there but gave him the OK to attack the South's Shiits to maintain control over the country. Same with Clinton. Let us not forget that the CIA propped Saddam regime since its inception. Today the US government is propping Maliki's government and is failing miserably. While Saddam was in power there were social, financial and security stability. The price for that stability was that you could not criticize the ruling party. Compare to what you have today, Saddam ruling was a blessing. The blindness of the Bush's administration, is taking the ME to a new heights of uncertainty, which in turn creates pressure on Israel and Israel's goons put pressure on the Bush's administration and Bush makes more mistakes. Saddam will not be back and Iraq will not be peaceful again.