SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : 2007 Silicon Investor Stock Picking Contest - Metals -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: loantech who wrote (157)1/7/2007 12:48:01 PM
From: TheBusDriver  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 678
 
I think that is the 3 tom,

1 POG $800 on a closing basis in 2007 (a gift)
2 EPM will out perform CAU
3 TK finishes above GGN in the contest
4 There was one as I recall about CKG being $12 in 2007 but not sure that was taken up. This was done via PM as you did not want to embarrass yourself.

Wayne



To: loantech who wrote (157)1/7/2007 10:21:31 PM
From: hubris33  Respond to of 678
 
Opps, just found this post...(as far as my other post--->never mind...)

To that list of worries with GGN, I'd add that I'm a bit suspect of the proposed production level. No hard facts, just a feeling that USA & Canada producers need at least 100,000 opy to have a nice mine that can spread costs and have competitive operating costs. I see too many like RIC, SGR and HRG that have over $500+/oz in production costs.

Then it looks like a fair amount of the ore might be sulphide in nature??

But then again perhaps they can pull if off?

Good luck!

H3