Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Where the GIT's are going -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (130507)	1/8/2007 11:14:59 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 225578

I find the democrat Iraq contradiction to be a conundrum they will find difficult to extract themselves from without wearing a significant amount of egg. Leading up to the election of 2006, democrats were all over the airwaves criticizing President Bush for the execution of the liberation of Iraq. The most common comment from democrats was that we needed more troops. There was no hint of their cut and run philosophy from any democrat in a national election. Pundits claimed that the democrat gains on razor thin margins was a withdrawal of support for President Bush's Iraq policy. Fine, so the very thin democrat election victory was about the democrat vision for Iraq. It was supposedly a vote of confidence in the democrat position that more troops were needed to finish the job. Now the democrat leaders who hid their faces immediately before the election are saying we need to cut and run. The course being plotted by democrats should lead to electoral annihilation in 2008.