Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Uranium Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Douglas M. Benedict who wrote (6408)	1/7/2007 10:23:31 PM
From: Proud Deplorable	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30242

"why not go really efficient and get a Super Tanker laden with STUFF" Oh yeah? Well thats simple......a supertanker doesn't have wheels and if it did I'd surely get a ticket because its 3 blocks long and one of those blocks would almost certainly have a red light on while I was in the intersection. If it were an oil tanker though then it would be lost more economical for me if I owned the oil.

To: Douglas M. Benedict who wrote (6408)	1/8/2007 10:34:42 AM
From: Tommaso	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30242

>>>People with SUVs make far far fewer trips per day than do car owners who must go back and forth, back and forth all day long to move their purchases from the stores to their homes plus any other things they must carry or hire someone to carry for them at real additional expense."<<< I have to agree with you that that does qualify as one of the most stupid things I have read in a long time. Of course, I guess if you are a polygamist with six wives it would be cheaper to take them all to the grocery store at once to go shopping.