Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The new NFL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SE who wrote (15623)	1/8/2007 7:00:12 PM
From: Nemer	Respond to of 89648

Scoot ... I feel sorry for Romo being placed in the position to potentially have caused the loss. mentioned later down in the site you posted is the mention of the Seahawk ball boy saving the slickest ball for use by Dallas..... no question that is true in my mind ... BUT it is within the rules and it shouldn't be..... not as bad as having these multiBIliion payrolldollar teams and their multiBIllion operatingdollar teams MAKE DO with part time very lowly paid officials .... THAT is ridiculous. back to Romo ... I suppose he is the only starting QB to be the holder in the NFL ... that is kinda stupid too... not to get into a deep discussion, but this weekend at my Jesuit retreat suffering was a topics of one of the lessons .... in becoming a complete individual, at peace with himself and with the world, there are four basic steps .... suffering is negative in the first area where everyone starts out BUT it is a positive as one approaches the final plateau as it builds character and forges a stronger person ... Romo WILL be better for it as I think he has his head on his shoulders right already now shut up and pick so I can go opposite .... LOL