Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (16192)	1/11/2007 2:27:21 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 71588

doubt if you could find a single post of mine in which I said Clinton was an idiot. Maybe though. I always believed he was smart. He appears to be a sociopath though, which is hardly something most people would want on their resumes. Hardly a sociopath.....he's actually a brilliant man with a serious Achilles heel. I can see why you wish to cut off scientific debate. Opinions of people who cannot reconcile the reality of Saddam using WMDs is always superior to scientific debate. I never said I wanted to cut off scientific debate....that's your takeaway. Can you give a single reason why the opinions of partisans is superior to the scientific process? I am unclear with whom you've been discussing this issue in the past, but I can assure you there are all kinds of well known and respected scientists who agree that Global Warming is upon us. They came to that conclusion by going through the scientific process. What's rather disturbing is that you've managed to be avoid reading any of their findings and conclusions.