Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Boxing: The Sweet Science -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bwe who wrote (10359)	1/9/2007 12:51:59 AM
From: freelyhovering	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10489

Peter looked very much improved from the first fight. If he can kidnap Emmanuel Steward from the Klitcho camp, he might win the combined title.

To: Bwe who wrote (10359)	1/9/2007 3:27:25 PM
From: LPS5	Respond to of 10489

Hi Bruce, Happy New Year to you and everyone. I think the major difference between this fight and the first was Peter's punching style; in the first fight, he threw a lot of stilted, clubbing punches - "arm punches" - which for an evasive, slippery fighter like Toney are easily ducked and countered. This time around, the simple truism that 'the shortest distance between two points is a straight line' seemed his organizing principle, and it showed - a subtle but remarkably effective difference. I speculate that if Peter had fought the same way against Klitschko...or does the same, when they fight again...the outcome will be different. Straighter punches hit harder, consume less energy and are much harder to block, of course. I agree also with respect to Billy Blanks in the training camp: a negligible contribution. e