Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (192454)	1/10/2007 6:58:36 PM
From: Ish	Respond to of 793756

<<Not that it will probably succeed, but the fact that someone has managed to put their neck out says alot to me.>> That it does.

To: D. Long who wrote (192454)	1/10/2007 8:57:10 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793756

I don't see how we can maintain a long term policy to stop these Arab states from getting Nukes as long as we take the position that it is fine for us to have them. The hypocrisy is obvious, and the fact that we don't want them to have them so that we can attack them if we want is not acceptable to them. I think we need a national policy of being in favor of everybody getting rid of Nukes. And based on that, we say that while we are working to get the Chinese, Russians, French, etc, to agree, we will not allow anyone new to have them. We can "unleash hell" on anyone today without using them. If Russia implodes, as they well might, the danger of Russian Muslims getting Nukes is extreme. If we don't pursue this policy, I see no way, long term, of an American city not getting nuked.