Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (18879)	1/12/2007 9:10:51 AM
From: Lhn5	Respond to of 46821

news.com.com AT&T to phase out Cingular brand AT&T will begin to extinguish the cell brand to imprint its more-than-century-old name firmly across its services. By Reuters Published: January 11, 2007, 10:30 PM PST Tell us what you think about this storyTalkBack E-mail this story to a friendE-mail View this story formatted for printingPrint Add to your del.icio.usdel.icio.us Digg this storyDigg this AT&T will begin to extinguish next week the brand of cell phone operator Cingular, built up with billions of dollars over a few years, to imprint its more-than-century-old name firmly across its services. AT&T, which took full control of No. 1 U.S. mobile carrier Cingular with its $86 billion purchase of BellSouth last month, will launch on Monday a campaign to mark the change. "We did not enter that decision lightly," Wendy Clark, vice president of advertising at AT&T, said in an interview. "We came to understand that consumer customers and business customers alike are looking for a single provider. We heard it so consistently across the marketplace."

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (18879)	1/12/2007 12:50:03 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

[iPhone] Earlier today I commented in the Cook Report network economics symposium on Jobs' apparent disregard for the enterprise space when he decided to create a closed solution in the iPhone. After reading David Pogue's NY Times column ... "The Ultimate iPhone Frequently Asked Questions" pogue.blogs.nytimes.com ... I stated: "I usually find Pogue entertaining, sometimes even enlightening, but his manner in presenting this one suggests a level of misplaced confidence over his presumed grip of the situation. He's not privy to any sunset terms between Apple and AT&T, nor does he know what the intentions are behind future releases. If Jobs does intend to open the box sometime down the road, then he'd better make those intentions known at this time and give some guidance concerning what areas he intends to open. After the hype dies down and enterprise purchasing departments go about formulating plans for their next rounds of wireless contracts, iPhone's shortcomings will be seen as far more limiting than its mere inability to support the immersive qualities of Skype. There is a huge IT market to be concerned about, as well, lest employees be mandated to use multiple voice and data appliances where a single one would, or should, suffice. This is not the ordinary CES gadget release. A device of this type should portend to supplant other devices that currently support a wide array of both entertainment and business solutions, like the ability to support Asterisk-like clients, FMC, WLAN roaming, and other applications governed by enterprise IT designs, to name just a few. Apple may soon find that a lockup can work both ways." ------ Bob Frankston, who has appeared here in the past, then posted an opinion piece that he had presciently written for Jeff Pulver's Von Magazine back in the summer of 2005, which I've copied below. Enjoy! --- From: vonmag.com Those Orifices! By Bob Frankston August 2005 You’ll never think of carriers in the same way ever again… At a recent conference, "D" (d.wsj. com) Steve Jobs was asked about the plans for an "iPod" phone. He said "we're not very good going through orifices to get to the end users" (www.brianstorms.com/archives/000574.html). He got it just right. The idea of a "carrier" is innocuous. They carry your information for you. But the reality is they are gatekeepers that decide what your cellular phone can do and what it can't do. Even "gatekeeper" seems innocuous. The term "orifice" is more accurate and, just as important, more evocative with just a hint of profanity. Sure, the definition is "An opening, especially to a cavity or passage of the body; a mouth or vent" but we all know which one and it's not the mouth. People love their iPods and their cellphones. You can't say anything bad about either one and get taken seriously. It's a form of the Stockholm Syndrome in which hostages identify with their captors except that people don't think of themselves as hostages. The cellular phone is indeed a magical device, especially for those of us who are still excited by the idea that we can communicate with anyone wherever we are. I've tried to write about the fact that we are carrying around powerful computers but they are reduced to accessorized telephones. The carriers pick and choose features they will allow by whether they increase the ARPU (Average Return per User) and don't let us choose our own devices or features. When I travel I have to switch computers, I mean phones, because I use a CDMA phone in the US and a GSM phone when in Europe. I try to use similar phones but my choices are limited by the carriers. With enough effort I can use them as computers with applications for finding out where I am and can even browse the web. But the applications and web access are still second class compared to what I can do with my desktop computer. Too much attention is paid to "free" phone calls rather than the importance of taking control of our communications and reinventing telephony. It's hard to get people excited about new frontiers and possibilities. I can and do try to paint vivid and exciting pictures but that's not enough. They need to be credible. People see the carriers as their friends rather than orifices denying them the future. It took a long time for the car phone of the 1980s to become today's cell phone because the carriers defined the pace of change. After all, they were for business not personal use-my attempts to explain that they were more important for coordinating family activities was too unbelievable and the carriers made it difficult for individuals to experiment with new uses. Even when the carriers themselves started offering 9600 bps data for the cost of a voice call, they were trying to foist off WAP as the "wireless Internet". I try to explain the importance of separating content from transport but the politicians don't understand the concepts and don't want to risk changes that might cost them votes. As the one arguing for a change, the onus is on me to figure out how to explain it and even if I manage to make progress with the policymakers I still have to reach the wider audience that elects and reelects them. I can promise more opportunity but those who promise more ringtones get far more attention. Apple isn't the most benevolent company and Steve Jobs has been known for acting like, well, an orifice. But he has credibility and an aura and that's what counts. Steve Jobs referring to the carriers as orifices is the perfect sound bite. "D" cohost Walt Mossberg writes about personal devices for the Wall Street Journal. He's picked up on the orifice metaphor and I hope it has "legs" even if I have to mix metaphors. Most important, the image of having to go through these orifices to get to your phones is not only the right image, it resonates. You can be annoyed and frustrated at the carriers' polices but you're not going to tolerate having to go through an orifice to use your own "phone" (it's not just a phone!). The danger in overusing "orifice" is that we may soon see ads from Verizon claiming to have the most orifices of any carrier. Look what happened to "can you hear me now?"-it used to symbolize poor coverage but now it's a feature! --- MIT alumnus Bob Frankston was the co-developer (with Dan Bricklin) of the legendary VisiCalc. He later developed Lotus Express. During his 1990s tenure at Microsoft, Frankston initiated the home networking effort which has made it possible for you to buy a small router and easily connect your home with the Internet. ------