Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JeffreyHF who wrote (147597)	1/12/2007 9:20:02 AM
From: carranza2	Respond to of 152472

I hope they knew about the offending sentences. But I have tried major cases in which I blind-sided the other side with material like that, so anything can happen.

To: JeffreyHF who wrote (147597)	1/12/2007 11:14:57 AM
From: Jim Mullens	Respond to of 152472

Jeffrey, re: QCOM v BRCM and “.It is inconceivable that Qualcomm was unaware of every word in the witnesses`s book” I’ve got to agree. And, since that was a key element is yesterday’s proceedings, its funny that the article left us hanging out in left field on that exchange. Hopefully Qpeeper can give us his take. Re: “It also must have come up in his discovery deposition, as Broadcom would have questioned him on that point, to be prepared for his explanation” After some 20 years, I still vividly recall my experience in a similar matter on the hot seat, in front of the judge being interrogated by the opposing attorney as my 3 year long legal battle was at its crossroads. The opposing attorney thought she had me in the cross-hairs (short hairs as well??) as she jubilantly quizzed my on a revision I made in my deposition testimony given some three years earlier. She apparently thought her case rested on my apparent inconsistent answer. I remember my attorney’s face drop as she asked that question as they waited for my reply. I thought for a moment or two, and replied >>> “ I red lined and corrected the deposition ( a couple of words – “did not” vs “did” , something like that) as the court recorder must have misunderstood my answer. Isn’t that what I was supposed to do when I was given that transcript to review and correct?” Her arrogant / aggressive demeanor immediately vanished, as she fumbled and stumbled to gain her composure.