Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (320350)	1/12/2007 5:48:39 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1573850

That leads to same signing statement. Or a "non signing statements". Presidents don't sign bills when their veto has been overwritten. I don't totally disagree with your post. Its possible that the current situation could lead to some movement on the issue of the boundaries of power between the branches. But I think that impeachment is unlikely and conviction even more so. You might get conflict between the white house and congress, you might get more calls for impeachment, but actually impeachment, combined with conviction/removal? Its a really extreme long shot. And if congress tries to use the USSC to impose restrictions on the presidency its likely that the court would sidestep the issue or rule narrowly. I don't really think the boundary will be resolved any time soon.