Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich Bloem who wrote (147629)	1/12/2007 3:15:41 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Rich, this is what the newspaper report said [and I realize of course that the reporter may have gotten it wrong]: Under cross-examination of Richardson, Lee focused on one specific process used to compress digital video. Richardson had contended under direct testimony that the process is the same in both Qualcomm's patented technology and the H.264 industry standard. But Lee pointed to a passage in Richardson's book that said the process in the H.264 industry standard has “fundamental differences” from the process described in Qualcomm's patents. There is room for your interpretation, but I think it could clearly also as easily go the other way. Nonetheless, it is good cross-examination material and, as you say, you never know what sticks and what doesn't. Best to play it safe with material like that, IMO. We'll have to wait and see.