Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The new NFL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (15748)	1/13/2007 11:48:45 AM
From: Augustus Gloop	Respond to of 90451

Well...I don't know about that. I think we're almost maxed out with the number of teams we have now. There were tons of small market teams in the 1920's that played in Wisconsin but I just don't think we can replace them all. But I think you get my drift...the big ones need to be protected. Think of a league without the 7 teams we talked about yesterday. If revenue sharing ever went away I think the Packers would go with it. That would be a fairly big loss to the historical NFL. Much like the other teams we talked about. And somehow we have to get into the LA market. I can't think of 1 team that I'd like to sacrifice. Indy maybe be the most logical choice but I'd hate to see that clan given the keys to LA. Oakland would go but I like having the Oakland Raiders....the LA Raiders just didn't seem to have the same vile following