SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (192841)1/13/2007 12:53:03 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793750
 
Why would they be so stupid, when their current strategy of supporting terrorist proxies is working so well?

The worst response we ever gave the Iranians was when we identified the Terrorists who hit our Marines in Lebanon, Reagan OK'd hitting them from our offshore battleship, and Caspar Weinberger, the Sec of Defense, interposed himself and canceled the strike. Reagan found out about it later, and let it go.

When Weinberger died, I was amazed at all the good press he got. In the biggest moment of his life, he failed his country.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (192841)1/13/2007 1:38:15 PM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793750
 
Why would they be so stupid, when their current strategy of supporting terrorist proxies is working so well?

It's hard to move from the idea of war as conventional armies bashing it out to this more subtle form of war-by-proxy. It's a hard sell, because most people just don't get it. It just seems like a bunch of unconnected events, or as the media would play it, some generalized anger in the "Arab Street" at US policies. "Never mind the man behind the curtain..."



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (192841)1/13/2007 3:19:15 PM
From: carranza2  Respond to of 793750
 
They would have to be nuts to move openly on Iraq.

Aren't they, though? vbg