Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ichy Smith who wrote (54378)	1/14/2007 6:20:07 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

I admit, I thought George Bush should have attacked Iran, not Iraq. I thought Jimmy Carter should have attacked Iran, when iran declared war on the United States and invaded the United States. Iran has consistently used it's amazing income to foster murder, terrorism, and attacks on Americans, Israelis, and Lebanese, and others. The fact he invaded Iraq instead of Iran should tell you something. Was it the son trying to prove something to the father? I think so. Just what we needed.......accommodating a spoiled brat in his rebellion stage while he's president. I have no patience for the Democrats, I heard Bill Clinton call for more troops in the present war, now they are complaining that, although they told everyone they wanted more troops to fight the war, they now want fewer troops. More troops may have been more effective in the beginning; in the first year. They might have prevented civil war then. Its too late now. The country is completely out of control. We need now to withdraw and let the Iraqis duke it out for their future. Just because you don't like George Bush, is no reason to decide that if he decides to do what you suggested, he must be wrong. My suggestion was not to invade Iraq in the first place. I fought it from the get go. Mr. Bush has never done what I've wanted.