SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WAR on Terror. Will it engulf the Entire Middle East? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ichy Smith who wrote (19207)1/15/2007 3:02:35 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32591
 
Bush didn't lift a finger to avenge the USS Cole after February 2001 when he was told Al Qaida were to blame. Bush waited a year, well after 9-11, when he finally took some action against Al Qaida. My point is, Clinton attacked as soon as he found out evidence linking Al Qaida to any attacks. Bush ignored all such evidence and all the warnings.

A huge effort has been made to try and take the blame off Bush for 9-11, but it was on his watch, he was warned and he did absolutely nothing. No more excuses. Bush has a terrible record as a commander in chief. Just awful. Couldn't be worse really. Literally, with Bush in charge who neds enemies? He creates new enemies too in everything he does.

I would listen to many wise Republicans who had taken strong stands against Bush-cheney now. This isn't liberals vs. Bush, this is honest people with sound minds and great experience vs. Bush including many top Republican leaders.



To: Ichy Smith who wrote (19207)1/15/2007 3:13:15 PM
From: Solon  Respond to of 32591
 
Seems like action to me...! :-)