SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : the FADG Insult Annex -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (9)1/15/2007 5:01:17 PM
From: SARMAN  Respond to of 44
 
I believe you would be one of them.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (9)1/15/2007 5:10:21 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 44
 
Perhaps Faultline would ban them eventually, but he would give a warning first, and most people could shape up after that.

But I don't see how that is a problem with the annex. If people on FADG can clean up their act there, by themselves, and post the insults here, that seems like a win win to me, with everyone happy, or satisfied, or assuaged, or whatever it is that insult posting gets one...

If Faultline were here, I hope he would approve. I think he would. I'm not sure I see a problem- unless people just don't use the annex, and insist on using the FADG thread- but that will be a choice made by the people posting on FADG, and not really a problem with the Annex (imo).



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (9)1/15/2007 6:13:41 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 44
 
Peter, you are a fascist, authoritarian weenie. The Feurer of your dreams has been a miserable failure, the worst President of my lifetime. Yet, you just can't quit him..



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (9)1/15/2007 8:07:17 PM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 44
 
With you at the top of the list.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (9)1/17/2007 10:26:22 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44
 
The four previous respondents to my message would all be on the ban list.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (9)9/30/2014 5:35:55 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44
 
I am starting to detect a bigger problem with the annex...