SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taro who wrote (321039)1/16/2007 11:33:45 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576644
 
re: 60 million Russians were killed by Lenin, Stalin and as "collateral damage" during WW II.

So your point is that Bush isn't as bad as Stalin and Lenin?



To: Taro who wrote (321039)1/16/2007 1:16:58 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576644
 
>Most of this uncovered after 1990 but still never got decent press cover anywhere including by your NYT and WP.

That's because our NYT and WP LOVE Communists, like we do!

-Red Z



To: Taro who wrote (321039)1/16/2007 7:03:03 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576644
 
Total deaths caused by Lenin and Stalin maybe but 60million seems high for just WWII, esp. since you mention collateral damage so you presumably exclude soldiers.

The NYT certainly did whitewash the "man made famines". I think you might be combining those with WWII, and other smaller events to get the 60 million figure. Even then it might be slightly lower, but the general scale is right, if its 50 not 60 its not worth having a big argument over it.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News