Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rink who wrote (567)	1/17/2007 10:48:59 AM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1141

Rink - Be consistent now. I went over the limit yesterday and "turned myself in" on the Mod board.

To: Rink who wrote (567)	1/17/2007 11:47:21 AM
From: pgerassi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1141

Dear Rink: I protest this strongly! I was just replying to a message. You didn't even give a warning. Some of yours are off topic too, why don't you suspend yourself? Pete PS my PC is AMD powered. And the thread was started here by someone talking about AMD Live and their stereo: Message 23189487

To: Rink who wrote (567)	1/17/2007 8:57:05 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1141

Rink, I just want to clarify one thing. For example, Joe reported himself, and _ voluntarily _ stopped posting on main thread on 1/15/07 at 10pm. Message 23187165 You suspended him on 1/17/07 around 8AM. So effectively he will not be able to defend his positions for almost 4 days. Does this mean that a person should continue to post in a normal way until he gets prosecuted? Another thing, what if he commit more offences like OT-posting? It sounds that there is some implicit "statute of limitation" in your judgement practice. Shouldn't it be spelled out in main rules? Regards, - Ali