SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (58737)1/17/2007 6:24:58 PM
From: waitwatchwander  Respond to of 197244
 
A Comparative Study of DCT- and Wavelet-Based Image Coding

research.microsoft.com

<snip>We benchmark the performance of the wavelet-based video coder proposed by Sarnoff Corp. [16] against that of the current MPEG-4 verification model (VM), which is a slightly modified DCT-based H.263 coder.



To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (58737)1/17/2007 6:25:01 PM
From: JGoren  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 197244
 
Even though the money is small, Qcom needed to respond with an affirmative claim against Broadcom in order to raise the stakes to Broadcom. Best defense is a good offense. It's also a way of getting back attorney fees. Plus, it may be helpful against other companies in regard to the video compression issue.

If Q put on no evidence of damages as to the second patent, it may not be able to receive any. Still, would not disallow an injunction for infringement.



To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (58737)1/17/2007 9:33:21 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Respond to of 197244
 
If the infringement occurred, then all the manufacturers who relied on the BRCM product could also be affected. They would then have to obtain a license from QCOM to sell anything using this patent.

So QCOM is looking for future income as well as past damages.

Art