Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mistermj who wrote (213529)	1/18/2007 4:19:41 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 281500

Ralph has always been very forward in declaring his Anti-Americanism. I don't see how anyone could object to you pointing out the particulars but that's my opinion of course.

To: mistermj who wrote (213529)	1/18/2007 8:57:17 PM
From: Noel de Leon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Here is the sequence which lead to your arrogant rant. You wrote: "BDS alert...ralph is here. The term "Bush Derangement Syndrome" is usually applied as a derogatory term to imply that an opponent cannot be reasoned with or that complaints lack substance aside from anti-Bush hatred, due to the illogical connection to the charge." I redefined your rant into a rant of my own: "The correct definition of BDS is: The term "Bush Derangement Syndrome" is usually applied as a derogatory term to imply that a Bush II supporter cannot be reasoned with or that complaints lack substance aside from pro-Bush adulation, due to the illogical connection to the charge." To which you(of course) disagree: "No, depicting Bush as Hitler is classic BDS. It's not even arguable between rational people. Nuff said." That sounds as if you are accusing me of depicting Bush as Hitler. So I asked to whom you are referring. "Who has depicted Bush II as Hitler? More spin, more nonsense, more derangement. You may be a Deranged Bush Supporter(DBS) suffering from BDS." Of course you recognize that I didn't write what you implied I wrote. Not being able to accept that you write: "You are as misinformed about this forum as you are about everything else in the world. You are always good for a kneejerk shot from the hip. With a reference to RE. To which I point out that you should write to RE: "If you have a problem with Ralph Emerson then send your knee jerk drivel to him. I have not referred to Ralph Emerson's missive. Your guilt by association methods are typical of right wing tactics. No case so accuse with an indirection." To which you rant: "I did point out Ralph's BDS to him...you arrogant misinformed ignorant twit." So what was your point in associating my posts with RE's. By the way RE didn't depict Bush as Hitler(no mustache, no weird hairdo). RE depicted Bush as a neo nazi, far worse in my opinion. His desecration of the flag is foolish as it draws attention away from what I think is RE's main point.