Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (13610)	1/18/2007 9:55:36 PM
From: Seeker of Truth	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 218928

If Israel bombs Iran's nuclear facilities the crisis would last about 48 hours, I think. Most countries would say tut tut to Israel and the oil facilities of Iran would remain intact. The US would of course defend such gangster like behaviour. So you would have to sell your oil rapidly. The UN, alas, seems only capable of scolding, so long as the security council has a veto power for the favoured five.

To: TobagoJack who wrote (13610)	1/19/2007 2:03:55 AM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 218928

Not quite accurate. China and other countries have long called for discussions to develop a legal framework for space conduct, but the United States has been unwilling to join them. As a result, China's ASAT test was legal. The destruction of the satellite was not made by any anti-satellite weapon. It is just to put a device on the path of the satellite you want to destroy. both hit at very high speed. Causes a cloud of debris to orbit earth. Anything that make space communications insecure, unreliable and more expensive is good for Elmatador who climbs poles around the world -like AC Flyer used to put- implementing ground based communications network. Good for fiber optics and GSM. UCS Statement on Chinese Anti-Satellite Test WASHINGTON, Jan. 18 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The following statement was released today by David Wright, co-director of the Global Security Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists: "China's Jan. 11 test of a kinetic energy anti-satellite (ASAT) weapon apparently destroyed a defunct Chinese satellite by slamming into it. UCS strongly opposes the development, testing, and deployment of such ASAT weapons by all countries. Space is uniquely well suited to a wide range of scientific, civilian, and military purposes. Debris produced by the testing or use of kinetic energy ASATs threatens the use of space for these purposes. China's test merely demonstrates what we already knew: satellites are by nature vulnerable to attack. Moreover, the development and use of ASAT weapons threatens to undermine relationships and fuel military tensions between space-faring nations. For these reasons, we: -- urge China to abandon destructive ASAT weapons testing; -- urge the United States not to resume an ASAT test program; -- call on the United States to enter international discussions to develop rules guiding the use of space and to ban the testing and use of destructive ASAT weapons. China and other countries have long called for discussions to develop a legal framework for space conduct, but the United States has been unwilling to join them. As a result, China's ASAT test was legal. Because kinetic energy ASAT weapons destroy satellites by colliding with them at very high speeds, their use creates large amounts of space debris, which can remain in orbit for very long times and threaten other satellites. The Chinese satellite that was destroyed had a mass of 750 kilograms and was orbiting at an altitude of 850 kilometers. The collision would be expected to completely fragment the satellite into millions of pieces of debris: nearly 800 debris fragments of size ten centimeters or larger, nearly 40,000 debris fragments with size between one and ten centimeters, and some 2 million fragments of size one millimeter or larger. At the very high speeds these debris particles would have, particles as small as one millimeter can be very destructive. While shielding on satellites can help protect against small particles, most satellites do not carry such shielding. Moreover, shielding is not effective against debris larger than about one centimeter in size. The altitude of this test was a particular concern for two reasons. First, because of the low atmospheric density at that altitude, half of the debris larger than one centimeter would remain in orbit for a decade or longer. Moreover, the orbital region around 900 kilometers is very heavily used by satellites for both civil and military uses, which are threatened by the added debris. The Chinese test was similar to the U.S. test of a kinetic energy ASAT weapon that destroyed a U.S. scientific satellite in September 1985, the last time such a test was conducted by any country. The U.S. test took place at 525 kilometers altitude." CONTACT: Adam Segal, +1-202-422-4673, David Wright, +1-781-643-8029, or +1-617-301-8060