Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Slagle who wrote (13626)	1/19/2007 9:46:52 AM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 219872

International law recognizes the properties. No matter what you go back and collect what has been yours. ABN-AMRO bank went back to China and got it's bank back. Expropriated properties by the communists in Prague? The heirs went there and took their properties again. I lived in a rented apt that was expropriated by the communists after WWII and later on returned to the hier of the original owners. Moonminoid and his mother got back what the Nazis expropriated from their Jew grandfathers or other relatives. It doesn't go to heaven just like that. Cuba opened up? Get ready for the heirs of the mafia go there and claim their properties. "What do you think will happen to foreign property claims in Iran and Iraq?" International law applies. I know of a few people holding Dinars. Once the Iraq is back on its foot, they will claim. Perhaps neo-cons thinks you can go and take property and then wirte off just like that... This adventure in Iraq will haunt the US for quite a while. Why do you think the US was quick to put a puppet government in Iraq, with that crook Chalabi who conned the US? It was to say, from an international law standing point, that is not an occupation force. To diminish the liabilities.