Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (9062)	1/19/2007 10:29:09 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

I think GW is a valid debate. Just because some group with an obvious agenda jumps on board one side of the debate doesn't make that side of the debate wrong. It's a matter of reviewing and interpreting the data correctly. The politics of it may be inconvenient, who really wants complete centralist government control? I doubt very few except raging stalinists craving for power over other peoples lives. The climate data still needs interpreting correctly though. If it's getting out of control due to human activity, something needs to be done.