SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stan who wrote (58796)1/19/2007 10:50:15 AM
From: hedgefund  Respond to of 197244
 
You may be right but I have generally found that news reporters are generally challenged when reporting trials and in this case, unless the reporter has scientific/patent expertise, a reporter would face a very difficult task. Very technical case, jury trial, home town client, I like those odds in general.



To: Stan who wrote (58796)1/19/2007 11:08:50 AM
From: JGoren  Respond to of 197244
 
Judge may have a judicial conference or other commitment today or may have needed to hear other matters (e.g., criminal pleas, sentencings, settlement announcements, etc. to get them off the docket and not have those parties waiting. Oftentimes, judges will set aside a particular day of the week to hear such matters.



To: Stan who wrote (58796)1/19/2007 12:14:26 PM
From: GO*QCOM  Respond to of 197244
 
<According to the San Diego newspaper, the trial is off now till next Wednesday> This may be a good thing since the facts in the case are so complex and the jury is foggy.The QUALCOMM rebuttal may be the thing that penetrates the most along with a great closing argument.