SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (213691)1/20/2007 12:39:49 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 281500
 
"The point is that the left offers nothing, is intellectually bankrupt, and does not appreciate very real dangers. "

I'm not sure how you are using "the left", but if you are using it as a synonym for "people who disagree with me", then you need to know that 1. the "left" is not monolithic 2. it has many ideas and 3. many appreciate the dangers, and the fact that people might differ with you over ways and means to cure the dangers, is not a failure to appreciate them.

PS- there is an insult annex to this thread. You and Neolib might enjoy using it, for the more "robust" portions of your dialog.

Subject 56940



To: carranza2 who wrote (213691)1/20/2007 12:51:00 PM
From: neolib  Respond to of 281500
 
Do we give them the finger or do we work with them because they have something we need and need badly?

The point is that the left offers nothing, is intellectually bankrupt, and does not appreciate very real dangers.

The problem with people on the right is that they will spend any amount of money on wars so that market forces rule in energy. Why not spend the war money on non-market intervention in energy fields? Stupidity can be found on the left and right quite equally, and generally along ideologically predictable lines. I happen to favor market practices in general, but I will take non-market economic intervention prior to external wars, even if the cost delta is a multiple.