SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (213774)1/20/2007 7:42:31 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"what 9/11 terrorist was Saddam sheltering?"

per your own wiki article- NONE

And I fail to see how any of what you said about the Kurds or Bin Laden relates to Saddam. That's what we were talking about.

And no- a bombing campaign is not an invasion:

en.wikipedia.org

For composition of the NATO troops that went in after the bombing:

en.wikipedia.org

Looks like it was mainly UK, French and US. Hardly what I would call "US". Take a look at the percentages aboove, and then look at the percentages of troops in Iraq. Oddly enough I've been told Iraq is a "coalition", but, imo, the troop numbers above are what a real coalition looks like- though the UK is certainly over-represented.

You still want to say the US was the major player in Kosovo?

I think the UK and France dominated in UNPROFOR too- but I don't have time to look those numbers up.