Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (9106)	1/23/2007 1:17:58 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Thanks for finding that, from Triffin's link (and it's well worth the read) I find Monckton make two telling points.. (i)"It is easy to claim a “consensus” if scientists who disagree are excluded." and (ii) "The Society’s long-standing funding by taxpayers does not ensure any greater purity of motive or rigour of thought than industrial funding of scientists who dare to question whether “climate change” will do any harm." It's great to read Monckton, he knows his stuff. I wouldn't blindly trust anything the publicity department of Exxon fed to the public though. I think Monktons stately home might need a new roof or something, the way he put a "cc" through to the Exxons CEO makes me suspicious he is scrounging for a job.. maybe even a "bung" -g-