Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (322324)	1/22/2007 9:55:48 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574767

Oh What a Crime It had to happen. Analysis to come later. Update: Prices are set through a system of trial and error; competition is what drives them down to near their average total cost of production. As long as market conditions remain relatively stable, prices will also tend to remain stable. But when market conditions change, prices too, will often change. Consider the price of gasoline following the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center. Gasoline refiners in this country, having been informed that the attacks were perpetrated by terrorists from the Middle East, had every reason to expect a disruption in the flow of crude oil into the U.S., hence there would be a reduced supply--a shortage--of oil in this country in the near future. Gas refiners responded by raising their prices now in order to conserve gasoline today when we have a relative abundance so that there is more in the future when we expect to have less. People reacted by reducing their amount of driving: they carpooled, biked more often, and made fewer unnecessary trips in response to the higher gasoline price. There was no magic price that gas refiners and dealers knew would result in a smooth allocation of gasoline over time; and in fact they didn't even have to know, their motivation was simply to try and maximize their profits. Those refiners and gas station owners who guessed wrong and priced too high or too low would lose profits. Those who set their prices too high found that consumers purchased their gas elsewhere and the supplier had an excess supply in the future when the price fell. For those who priced too low, they likely sold out of their gasoline supply and didn't have much left for future demand. This process ensures that we allocate resources efficiently and smoothly over time. This same principle applies to gasoline cans selling in Florida after a hurricane. Through a system of trial and error, sellers of gasoline cans, in their desire to maximize their profits (that nasty word), set prices via trial and error. The market has changed as a result of the hurricane and suppliers of goods and services respond by raising their prices in order to maximize profits. The result is that Floridians conserve these goods and resources now when they are relatively scarce, ensuring that those who need them most get them both today and in the future. What puzzles me about this linked story is that I wonder if there is a corresponding criminal investigation when market conditions turn the other way. Let's say that a new watch is invented that acts as a powerful electrical generator in emergencies. The watch only costs fifty dollars and the price of generators consequently falls to one-tenth their "normal" selling price. Will Florida's AG step in to ensure that the sellers and manufacturers of electrical generators don't get "gouged" by "profiteering" consumers? liberalorder.typepad.com

To: TimF who wrote (322324)	1/22/2007 10:10:26 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574767

re: Yes you had prosecutions in FL for price increases. The crime was gouging, not "price increases". re: Well away from the area devasted by the hurricane, increases of 72 cents (not 10x like you talked about before), when demand is up and supply is tight. Different example, and you know it. You just don't get this do you? Normal people don't screw their neighbors in crisis situations, it's considered anti-social. Normal people help their neighbors, at the least treat them fairly. You can argue all day, but society criminalized the abhorrent behaviour that you support. What does that tell you? Can you catch the hint?