Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taro who wrote (322365)	1/24/2007 2:45:33 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574566

I am sure you find this all very amusing but your belittlingly response to the issue suggests an intelligence much less than you claim. There is enough evidence now that the climate has altered in the last 50-100 years; that ice packs in several locations are growing smaller and the air is warmer. We also know that CO2 levels have increased in the atmosphere. Many scientists believe there is a correlation between the increasing atmospheric CO2 and the warming of the atmosphere but no one can be absolutely certain. We also know that should the warming continue the global climate may undergo even more significant changes, and that the world's coastlines where a large percentage of the human population lives may become inundated. No one can say for certain that it will happen but increasingly the odds are favoring it and that suggests that some kind of action needs to be taken to try and mitigage the process. It certainly has become a serious topic that is under considerable discussion. So why would an intelligent person joke about it and belittle the theory behind GW?