Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (322568)	1/23/2007 7:30:22 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574093

re: Redistribution is taking from A and giving to B. If you reduce the amount you take and turn around and give, then you have reduced redistribution. Distribution is current. When Bush cut taxes on the wealthy it was redistribution, a change. The only way to semantically "reduce redistribution" is to reverse the tax cuts. But: that is redistribution... isn't it? I suppose you could go back to any point in time (and I'm sure old anal Tim will) and talk about reducing-increasing-reducing-increasing re-re-re-distribution. Must be hell in your mind.

To: TimF who wrote (322568)	1/23/2007 8:11:14 PM
From: SiouxPal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574093

What is your goal from this discussion? You both seem correct to me. What am I missing? Thanks.