Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (6011)	1/24/2007 9:58:33 AM
From: pcstel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8420

but when you make blatantly erroneous posts that don't involve a childish rant, I reserve the right to correct you. LOL!! We'll you keep looking for an erroneous post from me, because they don't happen very often. While you on the other hand, make blatantly erroneous posts on a daily basis. Here is just a couple from the last few days. Read the judge's opinion. She made it clear it was not a ruling on the merit of the RIAA's case, and only on whether there is a sufficient case to warrant a trial. Message 23208835 "A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) requires the district court to accept the factual allegations in the complaint as true and make all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's favor." This ruling never was about the merits of the case. Message 23209513 That was a quote from Judge Batts. I'm through with you. You don't know crap. Message 23210418 Or this little beauty.. LOL!! ANYONE can FILE for protection, but receiving it requires a showing of viability. Message 23205760 Has anyone else noticed that when David Ray is caught in a blatantly erroneous post. That he begins "name calling" as a defense mechanism???? And so it goes, PCSTEL