SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (214407)1/24/2007 3:00:17 PM
From: geode00  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
We 'declare' wealth all the time. We declare it in every tax law which transfers wealth from one individual to other individuals. We declare it in services offered up to businesses and individuals in the form of services and grants.

It happens every single day to all of us. Just go outside your front door and look at the sidewalk, the road, the electricity, the water...who pays for all of that? Who pays and why?

Where is the proof that providing universal healthcare will cause healthcare use to rise? Right now, US healthcare costs about double and provides less care and less health than that of other industrialized nations.

Much of what passes for 'healthcare' spending is the overhead of inefficient, ineffective administration and 'insurance' profits. Medicare has about a 2% admin cost while private insurance has as much as 10 times that.

As with anything else, a small percentage of users hike up costs dramatically. Most people need less than $1K/year of healthcare. A few need more than $25K. People in the last few months of life need the most. Why not look at the actual problem rather than the imagined one?

The problem with health insurance is the same problem we're now confronting with global warming and home owner's insurance: profits. Insurance companies want to make maximum profits while driving risk as low as possible.

The idea of insurance shouldn't be PROFIT but the sharing, over a large population, of RISK. This is the idea behind national healthcare.

When homeowners along the Atlantic seaboard lose their insurance, whom do they turn to? The government of course. In that case, boot the private insurers in the first place.

Ditto national health care. Private insurers are simply middle men who provide NO HEALTH CARE. Their purpose is to DENY health care which is really unhealthy.

I heard Bernie Ward on KGO this week talk about this quite eloquently. He noted that the President could, with an executive order, make Medicare available to everyone tomorrow.

Now wouldn't that be amazing.

We should all write him a letter telling him how he could salvage part of his legacy.

:)

Oh yes, boot the AMA's monopoly, they actively campaign to keep the number of physicians artificially low, most recently by cutting in half the number of foreign physicians allowed to practice here.



To: neolib who wrote (214407)1/24/2007 3:08:51 PM
From: Katelew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Universal health coverage, to be cost efficient, requires elimination of health insurance companies which obviously would be painful.

But right there, you knock off maybe 30% of the cost of paying the benefit.