SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: matherandlowell who wrote (58993)1/24/2007 9:57:35 PM
From: Glider05  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197606
 
This is a very intriguing statement from Keitel. Intriguing last quarter, too. I did not think, at the time, that the Motorola announcement was the news he was referring to. The statement is kind of confusing to me. "We're not going to buy back now because we know something the public doesn't, and it will be good news, therefore that would be unethical" (paraphrasing). Doesn't a company almost always know of things that will happen in the future that the public does not know? And if those things were to be bad news, then the company would not want to buy back at that time. It seems to me that this policy would preclude an ethical company from ever buying back shares.
I hope that the news Keitel is referring to is really big news, and we hear it soon.



To: matherandlowell who wrote (58993)1/24/2007 10:04:18 PM
From: voop  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 197606
 

Keitel made the point that the company continues to believe shares are undervalued but often does not feel that purchasing shares would be ethical because of the many positives undisclosed to the market


This seems really dumb to me. Its okay to have insider information when you are an insider.

Buy the damn stock if its severely undervalued.

DOH!