Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (58997)	1/24/2007 10:56:15 PM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196989

Disclosing that you have favorable material information is disclosure no matter how you slice it or dice it. But it is hard to bet against them. I wonder what the information might be? My guess is that a Qualcomm chipset customer might have won the "3G for all" contract. Something else of interest was PJ's mention of a "pre-UMB" trial. Slacker

To: carranza2 who wrote (58997)	1/24/2007 11:56:09 PM
From: Rick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196989

Why would it be unethical to but stock on a regular basis while telling the public that you consider it undervalued due to possible future events? After all, isn't that the position of everyone who buys low-dividend stocks? Unless you were 100 percent certain the event would come to pass, I don't see it as unethical. The only other unethical situation I can imagine is that the event is completely out-of-left field. That is, if it was never discussed in public at all, then it could never have been taken into account by the buying and selling public.